Monday, April 15, 2013

Burnout

My day job has been going through an awkward growing phase. Our department is merging with another department; and in a bid for more efficiency, they're streamlining jobs. Don't worry. No one is losing a job. It's that in the other department, people who had been doing three different things now gets to lob it off onto my department. Specifically me and my co-worker. That's fine. Whatever.

Meanwhile for the last nine months or so, I've been a part of a staff council, and we meet for about an hour or an hour and a half every other week. It's a good thing we're doing on the council, but the time requirements do take away from what I need to be doing at my desk. And my co-worker's, because I said she should sign up for the council too. I'm not a meeting person--and because the Universe knows this, there have been about three other groups I'm required to go to meetings now. I usually have one or two hour-long meetings a week now, when in the old days I had the luxury of zero meetings.

Good times.

Never mind this is the time of year when 2/3 of the applications I need to process come through the door and every other email is "You've had my application for MONTHS. When will I get a decision?" It's honestly all I can do not to start setting things on fire. My co-worker is dealing with the same type of headaches, plus doing a lion's share of the committee work. We're both going through burnout, each competing for the window to jump out of so we don't have to return to work tomorrow.

Then you've got the Spring that won't make up its mind to arrive, overcast days that remind you of Seattle, and a cold wind that says Winter isn't leaving ever. (Don't you hate it when houseguests refuse to leave?) We're wore out. We spend 10 p.m. Sunday nights looking forward to FRIDAY when we have another 2 day weekend and we haven't even arrived at Monday yet.

So I did something odd--with the blessing of my co-worker--I took a day off. Friday. Because weekends should really be comprised of three days at the minimum. Now the key to having an extra day to recover from burnout is NOT to sleep the whole time. And I'm a notorious sleeper. Instead I got up on Friday with plans...my plans, happy plans. To do things I'm normally too exhausted on my weekends to normally do.

I did dishes. I decluttered. I wrote some pages. I took a nap. I went to the store and acquired items to complete a Spring project I've half started. I made soup--good soup! I kept mostly off the computer and did not watch TV most of the day. I finished reading a book.

It. Was. Heavenly.

I woke up Saturday later but still boggled THIS was Saturday. I dawdled more, as in keeping with my typical Saturdays, but by mid-afternoon, I worked on the Spring project. I put my hands in the dirt; I was outside in the warm breeze and the Spring sun. I pulled weeds and dug up a little plot to turn into my Little Garden. I filled the area with heavy, black dirt; then I planted two of the goofiest tiniest sticks that are supposed to be lilac bushes into a pot. My muscles were already screaming at me, but damnit, this feels good. This is creative and productive and healthy. Now if my little garden will produce at least one thing I can eat this Spring/Summer, this will be a success.

Then again, it's already a success. I feel good. I feel hopeful. I'm looking forward to Monday instead of Friday. I'm already planning my next Burnout Day--next Friday, where I'll venture out to meet with a cousin and do all sorts of cousin things.

Do you suffer from burnout? What do you do to counter it? What do you wish you could do? How do you keep balance in your everyday life?
Friday, April 12, 2013

Piñatas




When my niece and nephews were younger and there would be family parties, my DH and I always brought a piñata. We lived in Southern California and there were places all over the area where we could buy them. Or sometimes we made them.


For those who don’t know what a piñata is, imagine a circle of kids surrounding one kid holding a piñata bat (looks like a regular wooden bat, carved and painted to be pretty). Blindfold this kid and then spin them until they didn’t know where they are, good and dizzy. Then point them at a suspended papier-mâché form, crammed full of candy, and let them whack away.

You know, describing it makes it sound really dangerous. It’s the most fun if you keep hauling the piñata out of their reach. (Sadistic, yeah. Hee, hee.) They take turns until someone finally destroys it and candy scatters and the kids dive in.

Used to love that game.

What does that have to do with writing? Well, I’m not sure, but it does seem to sum up the new world of publishing. I feel like a blindfolded kid. Or the piñata. Maybe one of the other kids, waiting for the candy to drop.

All I know is there is there is a bat out there being handled by someone with a blindfold on. I want to think it’s me.

My dearest Terri, sent me two emails on Wednesday. Two different self-published authors with words of advice. Sorta reminded me of that poem, two roads converged in a woods and I took the one less traveled … In an echo chamber, sung in a round. In a house of mirrors.

Everyone wants a short cut. I do. But I also know there simply isn’t one out there. It’s a crapshoot, it’s about the luck of finding that golden ticket. I’m a lucky person. Not always the most patient in the world, but I’m learning.

I loved those emails. I saved them and printed them up and put them in my white binder of manuscript prep. Someday I’ll write one. Right now, I don’t know what works. I’m not even sure what doesn’t work.

I do love an adventure! I may whine and cry sometimes about being disappointed, but then I get an awesome review and I just shake my head. Time will tell and all I can control is today. And when you’re blindfolded, holding a bat, all you can do is listen and swing with care…

Can you think of anything else that is so full of contrary techniques?  What has made you dizzy with what the heck you’re supposed to do, with anything? What do think? You feel like the bat? The piñata? The candy? Surrounding kids? Or do you hold the bat?
Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Winning The Battle

You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it.
-- Margaret Thatcher

The past few days I've seen multiple posts with quotes from Margaret Thatcher but the one above is the one that really stuck out and spoke to me. Combine that with Terri's post from Monday, and it's what's been on my mind, ta-da blog post!

Terri's reminder to us that a writer's process can change very much when you cross that oh-so-hard hurdle of becoming a gasp! published author had me commenting that I don't currently think to much about how much my output will need to increase. That's mostly because for the most part I've been losing the battle to write lately.

It's a battle I've lost and won many times over the past few years. My victories have been small ones though. Limited. Fleeting. Eventually I surrender and let the craziness of my life fly its flag victorious.

There are months I take back my lunches and write a good 500-1000 words a day. And there are months, nay, multiple months in a row where I'm lucky if 100 words get added.

But I continue to battle on. I will never give up until the winning days outweigh the losing ones. That will be when the shift for me from writing without thinking about the future to writing with the future in mind will happen.

Because The Iron Lady is right. Not every war is won or lost in a single battle. In fact, everyday that a writer puts words on paper is a day you won the battle. To find the time, inspiration and sanity(!) to get your story down is a victory. Each and everyday.

Does your battle tally show more wins than losses? What helps you win that battle from day-to-day and week-to-week? Do you approach getting words on the page as a battle or have you won the war and its now become conquered territory? Are you like me and have multiple battles going on in your life at the same time?
Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Comfort Reads and Comfort Flicks



I read a little cozy mystery last week called FARM FRESH MURDER by Paige Shelton, which had some crazy local characters, all capable of murder, and one cute amateur sleuth who nearly dies about four times before she solves the whole thing. I know many readers find these comfortable because they’re a comfortable blend of whodunit with a sprinkle of romance, a splash of spook, and heaps of laughter. Oh, and in the end, if it’s the right kind of cozy mystery, you get three or four recipes inspired by the book. Being my second biggest book collection is cookbooks, you can see why I might find these books fun.

This was pretty typical of the genre: there was a murder and we spent 280 pages trying to figure out who the heck did it. I think the author did an admirable job of keeping the tension going and there were some close calls. I’m not sure if I agree with the murderer she picked; I’m just not sure I got WHY they did it. Then again, there’s not always or usually logic in a murder, is there? Only in fiction is this “necessary”. All I know is that the book itself wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t quite the comfort read I was expecting. Perhaps because the murderer didn’t seem logical. I’m not sure.

But then this weekend, I also watched a movie you might have heard of, SKYFALL. And this is probably my one non-Anglophile thing, I’m not a fan of the James Bond movies. It’s not the character himself—the ultra super spy that can’t be killed no matter how close it may happen, he walks out with his tux still sharp. Bond, I like. It’s the girls…and the silly villains that get on my nerves because they’re so cartoony and insulting. (For some reason, I don’t find oversexed, alcoholic, witty super spy to be insulting at all. Odd.) Anyway, I don’t typically watch the movies; and the actors for these things are usually pretty darned hot, right? Seriously.

And I was watching SKYFALL, not altogether certain I would like it, but within the first ten minutes I was sure I was going to like this. Loved it actually. It’s the perfect comfort Bond flick—because let’s face it. He prevails. The man is shot in the first five minutes, falls into a river and doesn’t die of a gunshot wound, bleeding out, infection, or drowning? Riiiight. Even Batman is going, “Oh, come on!”

But what I loved about this particular Bond movie is how it pushed the boundaries of the “tried-and-true”, the things we enjoy most about a Bond movie with some really real thoughts. Like isn’t Bond getting a little old for this crap? How is he possibly still holding this together? But compared to some of the characters in this movie, Bond was the young-un. M and Kincade were both older than Bond—and still kicking ass. “Old people” (I use the term loosely) who still have it. But then you have Q, who looks 12 and is snotty as all get out about how smart he is (and how he wrote some of the programming the villain was using) and boom, the villain outwitted him with his own programs. Ah, youth. Don’t you love it when they’re humbled too? There’s some comfort that the young ones still need to take some lessons from the old dogs.

I mention the movie because it still ended up as a comfort flick. It ended how it needed to, how you expected it to end. Things were logical. Plots and subplot threads were all weaved and tied up at the end (appeals to my logical need). The song “Skyfall” had great meaning when I heard it again after watching the movie; and I even watched the movie again.

So…I think the discussion I’m having today is what is your comfort go-to read/eat/watch? Why? And what MUST be part of said comfort to make it a comfort or it just doesn’t work? Also did SKYFALL (if you saw it) work for you or do you prefer the Sean Connery ones? I realize SKYFALL might not be a comfort Bond flick for everyone. 
Friday, April 5, 2013

Llullu the Llama's Debut!


This is Llullu the llama - a character from a book I'm posting this month.  It's funny (at least I hope so) sci-fi and is called; DR. AWKWARD: The Adventures of Bob Palindrome in Space.  It's a serial novel and I'm just waiting on the cover.

So, Llullu is a miniature llama.  In the future, there are no dogs, so Bob Palindrome has a miniature llama - about two feet tall.  I found this realistic llama online and bought it. Then I spent the weekend gluing eyelashes on her because she didn't look feminine enough.

Yes, I'm still working on getting the Bombay book up - this is something different.

I did a little photo shoot of Llullu in my office.  To simulate space, I used this weird scrapbooking paper.  It came out like this:

 
 
Not bad - right?  The flash set off the sparkles to look like stars.  I am also working on making her a space suit.  I have a graphic designer trying to do that now for the cover. 
 
 
Anyway, I thought I'd share a snippet with you, about Llullu, because she has quickly become my favorite character - even though she didn't exist in the first draft at all.  My critique group wants to start experimenting with DNA and llama breeding, because they too, now want a miniature llama.
 
Here's the sneak peek:
 
            Walking into the small, grey cottage he called home, Bob dropped his keys into a dish inside the front door and propped the mannequin leg against the wall.  Within seconds a black and white miniature llama trotted into the room, rubbed her head on Bob’s knee and batted eyelashes a super model would kill for.  Fortunately, since super models were exiled to their own planet (apparently, they made people feel bad about themselves) this was no longer an issue.
            “Hey Girl,” He rubbed the soft spot between her ears and the llama made a purring sound.  By the time he sat down in his favorite chair, Llullu the llama had brought him his newspaper disc and a rather drooly pair of slippers.  She settled down at his feet and proceeded to chew on the carpet.
            Bob leaned back and closed his eyes.  Heaven, he thought.  Just like back in my grandpa’s day.  Just me and a dog…well, llama to bring me my paper and slippers.  The fact he slipped and said “dog” made him sad for a moment.  Ever since the Mad Canine Flu, dogs had become, more or less against their wishes, extinct.  Humanity had to make due with whatever they could (there was even an extremely brief revival of the Pet Rock craze), but things just weren’t the same.


Here's another scene - one of my favorites featuring Llullu:


Bob picked up his bottle of beer and went into the kitchen to find food. 

            Not dinner, mind you.  That would imply preparation on his part.  Bob pulled a log of sausage and block of cheese from the fridge and got a sharp knife from the drawer.  Llullu trotted into the kitchen and sank onto the linoleum, legs splayed in every direction. 

            Bob put the knife on top of the sausage and began to slice downward.

            Click.

            He looked at the knife.  It hadn’t made contact with the cutting board yet.  And under normal circumstances, as far as he knew, sausage did not go click.

            The sound seemed quieter than before.  He put the knife down and walked into the living room and stood there, waiting.  Bob waited long enough to feel completely idiotic and when there was no corresponding sound, he headed back into his kitchen.

            Llullu was standing on the table with the sausage log pointing at the ceiling, halfway down her throat.  She tried to look sheepish, but instead just looked as though she’d been impaled by lunchmeat.  Bob sighed and walked toward her.  He detached the meat from his pet and cut off the part she’d drooled on.  After slicing up the cheese, he carried his plate back into the living room and joined his beer.

So that's Llullu the llama.  The first serial comes out in April, the next installment, TACO CAT should be out in June. 

I think Llullu would make a nice addition to our pirate crew.

The Assassin
Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Tuesday Review: THE HUSBAND HUNT by Lynsay Sands

I tend to go in spurts with my reading and gorge myself on one particular type of book. For all the years of my adolescence it was inspirational romance, then I found thrillers, then contemps, then Regencies, Westerns . . . you get the idea.

Right now, I'm on a Regency kick. I find myself wandering the paperback aisle of the library looking for anything with a flowing gown on the cover. I inadvertently mention common Regency tropes at inappropriate places like staff meetings.
The Husband Hunt (Madison Sisters, #3)
And I'm also running out of authors. I'm picky about who I read, and so I usually stick to authors I know and love. Terrible way to read, I know. But I'm trying to branch out, and so I grabbed every Regency in the library that looked even remotely interesting and took them home.

Lynsay Sands' THE HUSBAND HUNT is one of the books I found, and the best of the bunch. It's the third in a series about the three Madison sisters, orphaned just before their coming out. By this book, the two older sisters have found love, and the youngest sister, Lisa, is 21 and looking to get married before she's officially on the shelf.
She has the man in mind--Robert, a young aristocrat from the neighboring estate--and when she realizes he has no interest in her whatsoever, sets out to enjoy the season and see who else she can find to marry.

But someone has decided to forego courtship and abscond with Lisa to Gretna Green. To protect her, Robert is forced to stay at her side while she flirts with every other bachelor in London.

I liked the heroine -- Lisa Madison -- in this story. And that surprised me. Lisa isn't the most, ahem, savvy of heroines. She manages to stumble into trouble with virgin-cheerleader-in an-axe-murderer-movie regularity. I believe she's kidnapped three separate times in the few weeks spanned in the book. She manages to botch her own ruination -- which she planned!

But in spite of all this, Lisa Madison is a cheery and fun heroine, whose exploits are at once practical and inept. Ms. Sands was able to use humor to her advantage, and turn what could have been a too-stupid-to-live character into a sweet and funny girl I wanted to spend the afternoon with and accompany on an adventure.

Ms. Sands is most prolific in paranomrals, vampires to be specific, and has only a few Regencies. I haven't tried one of her paranormals (see first paragraph), but if they're anything like this one, they'll be funny and well-written.

There were other flaws in this book -- the historical points weren't perfect, the language too modern. But the voice was strong and the writing snappy, and the heroine and humor were more than enough to carry me through.

Anyone read anything by Lynsay Sands? Know other books where good writing and great humor made up for an otherwise flawed story? Know any other authors who switch between Regencies and vampires?

Monday, April 1, 2013

Funny Bones: Not Everyone Is Blessed With One



Let’s start with the obvious: Humor is subjective. Some people laugh at The Three Stooges; some of us turn the TV-show to something less slapstick. Some people think The Office is the height of wit and hilarity; some of us don’t care for the mean-spiritedness associated with the show and characters. Some of us think Friends was the height of laughter, and still others were tired of the improbable rent-fixed living situation and Ross-Rachel-will-they-won’t-they before the end of the first season. 

It is what it is.  

The pro-side to humor is that there is no ambiguity. People are either going to get it or they won’t; and they’re going to think you’re a comedic genius or they won’t. You will know pretty quickly if the joke is going to work or not. All you have to listen for is crickets.

The con-side of humor is not everyone has a great sense of humor as you do. You’ll have to remove some of your funniest jokes for the sake of the manuscript. Skimming the fat, my friends, is healthy for all concerned.

So what does seem to work? No one knows, but here are the kinds of humor I enjoy and try to employ in my writing.

Non-Mean-Spirited Jokes. You may think sarcasm and wit is the height of hilarity—and speaking as a sarcasm expert, I do, but unfortunately many people do not speak sarcasm and do not care for it. More importantly, sarcasm—at its root—is an “angry funny” and people, typically, yourself included I’m sure, would prefer the non-angry kind of funny. Angry is construed as “this person is an asshole” and being you would like people to buy into your story and possibly give you money, being an asshole doesn’t typically help people part themselves from their cash. It’s not that you can’t or shouldn’t ever use sarcasm—there are more people who are fluent in it nowadays and thus more accepting—but like makeup, perfume, or knock-knock jokes, it should be used judiciously rather than liberally.

Self-Deprecating Jokes. When you have a “bad thing” happen to a secondary character, a bad thing that seems to add stress and conflict to the character, it is not as funny as if the hero was having the joke happen to him. The key reasons for this, I imagine, are that 1.) bad-funny things create conflict; and 2.) how the character reacts/rises above bad-funny things creates an emotional bond of empathy between the reader and character. You always, always want to create conflict and empathy in your stories; and if you don’t want to give them the Grapes of Wrath kind of conflict (and thus empathy), then you can give them the sorts of things your average reader could probably identify. Leaving the kid at the doctor’s office by mistake. A bad haircut the night before a big interview or wedding. Get caught having sex in the middle of the park or skinny-dipping in the town fountain on a dare. These can be funny things, but they’re funnier if the hero has to deal with the consequences, not an innocent third-party…or even a non-innocent third party.

Having “funny-bad” things happen to villains in a story also isn’t particularly funny. We all want justice, definitely, but if the villain has already learned his lesson or paid the price, shoving them into a hog pen and ruining their best clothes isn’t hysterical. No matter how much they may “deserve” it. There’s something to be said about tempering justice with mercy. Don’t do the “Jay Leno” Self-Deprecating Jokes. Don’t cross a line where you’ve gone from self-deprecating to bitter, mean-spirited, and sniping. This is the “painting the villains in a bad light” thing again. The complete opposite of what you wanted will happen: empathy for the villain and disgust for your character.

Running Gags, Patterns, and Elaborate Set-ups. This one is fussier than the other two, I think. More subjective again. I think we can agree assholes aren’t funny and not taking ourselves too seriously is. As a reader, I appreciate the “inside jokes” of my characters, mainly because they make the characters more human. One of the current running jokes in my life is if I meet a group of friends for drinks, one will ask if I’m wearing any socks, since I have a notorious pattern of when I get sick from drinking, I vomit into whatever convenient article of clothing that’s near me, usually mine, fortunately. Last time it was socks. If you have a cop character who is notorious for leaving behind her gun or dropping her gun during a tense situation, that’s an opportunity for an inside joke. Perhaps a bit mean-spirited, but since it’s on the main character, it seems self-deprecating so it balances out. Elaborate set-ups are like the kind of thing where a character is trying very hard to either learn something or keep something secret and goes to intricate lengths to do it. Things only get worse and worse, and then in the end, the punch line is that whoever he was keeping the secret from already knew or the information he was trying to learn about was known by everyone but him. The humor comes from the exaggeration and high stakes involved.

These are a few of my favorite funnies.

Agree or disagree? What kinds of humor do you like? Who are your favorite authors—or books with humor?